Landscape shifts for investment banks

Wall Street has resisted attempts to increase regulation for decades. So the decision by the two most prominent US investment banks to voluntarily submit themselves to scrutiny from the Federal Reserve is a vivid illustration of the changes in the regulatory landscape.

The move by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs is a final recognition that the blurring of the lines between commercial banking and investment banking requires a new regulatory framework for the financial services industry.

The changes in the shape of the industry date back to 1999 and the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed a merging of commercial and investment banking. The act effectively repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, the 1933 legislation that had enforced a separation between the two activities.

您已閱讀25%(790字),剩餘75%(2340字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

相關文章

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×