管理

Organisations must give more of a voice to their naysayers

It is rare that systemic breakdown comes close to home. The intelligence failures that led to the September 11 terror attack, when I was based in New York, were one example. The collapse of Lehman Brothers was another.

And then there is the Great Train Timetabling Disaster of 2018. This was a classic bathetic British balls-up. Two UK rail operators botched an ambitious timetable change in May. Nobody died. Global markets were unmoved. A lot of commuters — this one included — were disadvantaged and grumbled a little more loudly than usual about train delays and cancellations. Politicians, in a report issued last week, said the episode would “live long in the memories of a large proportion of rail users as a prolonged period of intensely inconvenient, costly and, on occasions, potentially dangerous disruption”.

If an inconvenience “lives long in your memory”, you probably need to get out more. But the shambles did have distressing consequences for some, particularly disabled passengers, and research has shown that any bad commute can inflict real economic and psychological costs.

您已閱讀23%(1092字),剩餘77%(3665字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×