觀點工作生活平衡

It’s not only working mothers who benefit from flexible jobs

Ruling out so many potential candidates at a time of staff shortages is irrational

In Victorian Britain, working mothers were generally seen as an economic problem — or at least the symptom of one. A mother who had to work for wages was probably someone whose husband had died, was unemployed, had become disabled or couldn’t earn enough to support the family.

As historian Helen McCarthy writes in Double Lives: A History of Working Motherhood, the women didn’t always see themselves as victims. As one woman whose injured husband was well enough to take charge of the home observed to the Fabian Women’s Group: “It is such a nice rest for me to go out to work.”

Almost 150 years later, what it means to be a working mother has changed profoundly. As McCarthy puts it: “What was understood to be a social problem arising from economic pressure on families has become a social norm rooted in a more expansive set of needs, rights and preferences felt and asserted by mothers.”

您已閱讀20%(891字),剩餘80%(3626字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×