專欄公司治理

When to call time on imperial chief executives

In the recent Financial Times report into the downfall of Carlos Ghosn, head of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi carmaking alliance, one sentence jumped out. Nissan was “a corporate culture in which no one can make any objections or say ‘no’”. People did not criticise Mr Ghosn because they feared retaliation.

These observations came from an internal Nissan governance investigation but they could be said of almost any company. Companies are not democracies. And while each organisation allows a lesser or greater degree of freedom of speech, there are lines that cannot be crossed. Criticising the chief executive is usually one of them.

This raises a problem when it comes to ensuring companies don’t run out of control. Businesses are like families; only those inside them really know what is going on. Outsiders — stock market analysts, investors, the media, even the board — can do their best to find out, but they rarely discover the truth. The employees who do know are tightly constrained. They do not want to lose their jobs or risk their promotion prospects.

您已閱讀26%(1065字),剩餘74%(3100字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

斯卡平克

邁克爾•斯卡平克(Michael Skapinker)是英國《金融時報》副主編。他經常爲FT撰寫關於商業和社會的專欄文章。他出生於南非,在希臘開始了他的新聞職業生涯。1986年,他在倫敦加入了FT,擔任過許多不同的職位,包括FT週末版主編、FT特別報道部主編和管理事務主編。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×