觀點抗議

FACTORY DAMAGE IS AN AFFRONT TO THE RULE OF LAW

The recent acquittal of seven activists charged with smashing up a Brighton factory they accused of supplying arms to Israel has attracted attention primarily because of the anti-Israel remarks of the judge, George Bathurst-Norman. His summing-up to the jury at the crown court in Hove, now available online, is startlingly tendentious, but the case is part of a wider trend of English juries returning “not guilty” verdicts on people who have damaged the property of companies they disapproved of.

In 2000, 28 Greenpeace activists were acquitted of destroying a field of genetically modified maize they said could contaminate neighbouring crops. In 2008, an English jury returned a “not guilty” verdict on six Greenpeace members who caused £30,000 of damage to a power station owned by Eon, the German energy group, because they objected to plans to build a coal-powered generating plant on the site.

In the Brighton case, the seven were charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage after they broke into a factory owned by EDO MBM, part of ITT of the US, during the 2009 Gaza conflict, causing £187,000 of damage. The factory, which they accused of supplying bombing equipment for US-supplied F16 jets used by Israel, had to close for a week.

您已閱讀29%(1247字),剩餘71%(3121字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×