專欄勞工權益

The ‘955’ work shift has long given way to a more flexible schedule

My first reaction to Chinese technology workers’ protests about long working hours was: how quaint. My second: how old-fashioned.

The “anti-996” campaign is  blacklisting companies such as Alibaba and JD.com where, it claims, shifts of 9am to 9pm, six days a week, are common. Alibaba has not commented. JD.com said it did not oblige staff to work such hours but it encouraged everyone to “fully invest themselves”.

The protest is quaint, because in white-collar offices, whether law firms, software companies or news organisations, a 955 lifestyle has long given way to something more flexible, or, in the current jargon, agile. It’s old-fashioned because working hours have been a flashpoint almost since managers started organising workers for greater productivity 200 years ago.

您已閱讀17%(780字),剩餘83%(3869字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

安德魯•希爾

安德魯•希爾(Andrew Hill)是《金融時報》副總編兼管理主編。先前,他擔任過倫敦金融城主編、金融主編、評論和分析主編。他在1988年加入FT,還曾經擔任過FT紐約分社社長、國際新聞主編、FT駐布魯塞爾和米蘭記者。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×