觀點管理

Silence isn’t golden, whistleblowers are

Most employees do not leak information because they want to but because valuable insights are ignored

The writer is the author of ‘Wilful Blindness: Why We Ignore the Obvious at our Peril’

Last week, when Extinction Rebellion targeted LinkedIn, it wasn’t trying to bring the organisation to its knees. It wanted to connect with potential whistleblowers inside Shell, Exxon, HSBC and the UK’s HS2 high-speed railway. LinkedIn ads targeted those companies’ employees, alerting them to a secure “truth telling” platform to report greenwashing. On the same weekend calling cards were delivered to smart London neighbourhoods, encouraging readers to blow the whistle wherever climate change wasn’t being addressed seriously.

The activist group had tapped into the zeitgeist. Last year, whistleblower cases asserting unprofessional standards in financial services rose by 35 per cent. Deloitte has warned of a new “whistleblower environment” in the pandemic which it attributes to greater workplace health concerns, record unemployment and the compliance problems of staff working from home. (At the same time, Deloitte faced its own whistleblower, who has alleged audit faults in the company’s Beijing office.) Problems at Rio Tinto and at Boeing have also been prompted or exacerbated by information leaked by insiders.

您已閱讀27%(1211字),剩餘73%(3353字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×