專欄中國經濟

JD.com Sets Precedent with Full Social Security for Delivery Riders

JD.com's initiative to provide comprehensive social security for its full-time delivery riders marks a significant shift in China's gig economy, prompting industry giants like Meituan and Ele.me to follow suit. While this move aims to enhance economic security for workers, it raises questions about the structural impact on flexible employment and the potential for increased workload and reduced job opportunities for part-time riders.
This English translation is AI-generated and provided for reference only.

In February 2025, JD.com announced plans to gradually provide full social security coverage for its full-time delivery riders, with the company covering both the employer and employee contributions for all full-time riders on JD's food delivery platform. This move makes JD the first "all-inclusive" platform in the industry. This means that a rider earning a monthly salary of 7,000 yuan will take home the same amount as they would without social security contributions. As a new entrant in the food delivery sector, JD's initiative to reshape the market landscape has set a trend, prompting Meituan and Ele.me to follow suit.

The push by food delivery platforms to provide social security can be seen as the internet's spillover benefits to other industries, representing a path for increasing per capita income and economic development in China. However, paying social security is not the same as giving more money directly to the riders. This difference constitutes the structural aspect of the spillover benefits.

The structural aspect, simply put, is about how the benefits are distributed to the riders—whether through higher wages or social security contributions. For instance, a survey by East China Normal University shows that over 30% of Shanghai's riders earn less than the local social security base threshold (7,384 yuan/month). If they were to pay for social security themselves, the amount required would represent a higher proportion of their actual income than the statutory contribution rate, both for the platform and the individual. Essentially, what could have been given directly to the riders is instead provided in the form of social security.

您已閱讀13%(1669字),剩餘87%(11255字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

遠觀近思

劉遠舉,重慶人,先學理工科再學經濟學,從事過諮詢行業,現爲自由撰稿人。關注時政、財經、科技,旨在探尋現象背後的事實與公正。文風理性、客觀,且用人性的溫度替換虛僞的中立。微網誌ID@劉遠舉。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×