觀點管理

Why ranking employees by performance backfires
給員工排名是好是壞?

The ‘forced distribution’ model used by many companies is an outdated idea that should be scrapped
奧康納:許多企業採用的「強制分佈」績效評估制度已經過時,有諸多負面作用,應該予以廢除。

When Bill Michael, the former chair of KPMG, told staff to “stop moaning” in a virtual meeting in February, one of the issues they were complaining about was the “forced distribution” model used to assess their performance. This way of appraising people is a zombie idea. No matter how many times it proves disastrous for a company’s culture or morale, it refuses to die.

畢馬威(KPMG)前董事長比爾•邁克爾(Bill Michael)今年2月在一次虛擬會議上要求員工「停止抱怨」。當時,畢馬威員工們抱怨的問題之一是公司用來評估他們表現的「強制分佈」(forced distribution)模式。這種評估方式簡直成了一種殭屍化的理念。無論多少次證明這種方式對企業文化和士氣來說是一場災難,它都沒有徹底死掉。

您已閱讀9%(540字),剩餘91%(5582字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×