專欄新型冠狀病毒

How politics thwarted the UK’s Covid-19 response

When the inevitable national inquiry reports into Britain’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, the first item on the charge sheet will be a failure to act decisively at the outset to suppress the pandemic.Some Whitehall insiders call this a stumble, a passing hesitation. Some talk about reckless complacency. Others observe laconically that Prime Minister Boris Johnson does not react well to bad news.

Britain lagged behind most of Europe in the spread of the infection. Yet, in spite of the lessons to be drawn from Italy and elsewhere, it has one of the highest death rates outside of the US. Management failures in procurement and distribution compounded political mistakes in depriving it of critical resources such as ventilators, testing capacity and personal safety equipment.

The postmortem, one old Whitehall hand says, will be “bloody”. Ministers and political aides are already privately shuffling off responsibility to institutions such as Public Health England and the civil service, suggesting they have been slow to react to fast-moving events. Prudent officials say they are keeping detailed personal diaries to record the advice they offered to Mr Johnson and his ministers.

您已閱讀23%(1191字),剩餘77%(4090字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前擔任英國《金融時報》的副主編。作爲FT的首席政治評論員,他的專欄每兩週更新一次,評論全球和英國的事務。他著述甚豐,曾經爲英國前首相托尼-布萊爾寫傳記。斯蒂芬斯畢業於牛津大學,目前和家人住在倫敦。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×