觀點多元化

Diversity versus merit is a false choice for recruiters

It is well established that diversity boosts creativity and reduces groupthink. So the Bank of England has adopted a challenging set of diversity targets. Considerable progress has been made in ensuring that the BoE reflects the nation better — women now make up 31 per cent of our senior team, up from 17 per cent in 2013 — and diversity is at the heart of the “One Bank” strategic plan.

Similar initiatives across the public and private sectors show that attitudes are shifting. But while people believe that workplace diversity is valuable, they also think recruiters should choose the best person for the job. The problem is that these propositions have a nasty habit of jarring. How many times have you heard an organisation say they would have loved to close their diversity deficit, but selected “on merit”?

This is a false trade-off. It stems from using too narrow a definition of “best person for the job”. This can make for faulty hiring decisions and a less diverse workplace. If relatively simple steps are taken to widen the definition, this could transform organisational strength.

您已閱讀27%(1093字),剩餘73%(2978字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×