寶萬之爭

China Vanke dispute opens a new chapter in investor activism

Where there is shareholder capitalism, there is bound to be shareholder activism: that at least is the assumption in developed stock markets. The fight over the future of China Vanke, the property company, is testing whether that equation computes in mainland China.

Seen from the City or Wall Street, it looks a straightforward enough spat: a big established company, whose shares are widely held, attracts noisy investors such as insurer Baoneng. Faced with a transaction they dislike — in this case, Vanke’s proposed purchase of assets and equity from Shenzhen Metro in exchange for shares — some of these investors get upset and start to push back.

Wang Shi, Vanke’s charismatic chairman, has even lambasted Baoneng as a “barbarian”, echoing the description the late Ted Forstmann used in the 1980s for corporate raiders massing at the gates of traditional companies, giving Bryan Burrough the title for his bestseller about the buyout of RJR Nabisco.

您已閱讀34%(953字),剩餘66%(1877字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×