FT商學院

Law must ignore the political hand-wringing around Trump

Colorado’s supreme court move may have actually helped the ex-president politically. But that can’t matter

Court cases brought against a former president who also happens to be the frontrunner for a third go atop his party’s national ticket are inevitably political, regardless of high-minded claims by prosecutors and judges that they are pursuing them only because democracy demands that no man stands above the law. 

The latest to make this argument is the chief justice of the Colorado supreme court, Brian Boatright. In his explosive opinion on Tuesday barring Donald Trump from his state’s primary ballot, Boatright argued that he and his colleagues on the bench were “mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favour, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach”.

Boatright — plus the local and federal prosecutors who have indicted Trump four times, and the congressional leaders who impeached him twice — is not wrong. Equality before the law is arguably the most sacrosanct of democratic principles, particularly at a time when Trump and many of his fellow travellers elsewhere have begun to wrap themselves in the trappings of authoritarianism.

您已閱讀31%(1114字),剩餘69%(2512字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×