觀點人工智慧

AI-driven justice may be better than none at all
人工智慧司法:不完美,但比沒有好

Some fear automation reinforces bias and dehumanises, but ‘robot judges’ can also tackle backlogs
凱莉:雖然人工智慧驅動的判決相比人類法官判決有諸多缺點,但它可以讓人們更容易使用法律程式並解決案件積壓。

A few years ago I was hauled up in front of three magistrates in a south London courthouse, the culmination of a months-long bureaucratic nightmare that landed me with a criminal conviction for being unable to prove I had paid a £1.50 bus fare when my phone ran out of battery. After nervously recounting my tangled tale of woe, I was vindicated: I was told my conviction would be withdrawn. “I bet you’re very relieved,” the presiding justice said to me with a sympathetic smile. I was indeed.

幾年前,在倫敦南部一家法院,我被傳訊到三名地方法官面前,先前長達數月的官僚噩夢在這時達到了高潮——在那場官僚噩夢中,我被判有罪,因爲我無法證明自己在手機沒電時支付了1.5英鎊的巴士費。

您已閱讀9%(587字),剩餘91%(5664字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×