專欄金融市場

A fetish of illiquidity is driving finance

History repeating itself as banks and pension funds bet more on private assets

John Maynard Keynes famously declared in his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money that “of the maxims of orthodox finance, none, surely, is more antisocial than the fetish of liquidity”.

If the great economist were around today he might have worried instead about the fetish of illiquidity.

The vulnerability of the banking system before the financial crisis was partly attributable to a dramatic liquidity decline. In the 1960s, commercial banks in the UK and much of the developed world held 25 per cent or more of their assets in cash and short term government paper that was free of default risk.

您已閱讀13%(610字),剩餘87%(3984字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×