中美貿易戰

Why China should agree a European trade deal

“Large multinational corporation signs agreement to invest billions of dollars in China petrochemical plant.” Yawn. It is not nearly as exciting as a trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

That is why a July 9 agreement concerning a $10bn investment by German chemicals giant BASF in a wholly owned facility in southern China received almost no press coverage, especially compared with the opening shot of US president Donald Trump’s trade war with China three days earlier. 

The two events are, however, closely linked and reveal much about Beijing’s penny-wise, pound-foolish approach to market access reforms over recent years. Chinese companies have profited enormously when foreign investors have been forced to operate through joint-venture structures, but China would have benefited much more if such requirements had been eliminated a long time ago. 

您已閱讀19%(870字),剩餘81%(3628字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×