專欄Uber

Germany’s taxis should not triumph over Uber

Another week, another regulatory battle for Uber, the Silicon Valley private car hire network with a German name. This time it is in Germany, where a Frankfurt court has banned its Uber Pop“ride-sharing” service that introduces passengers to unlicensed drivers through a smartphone app.

In a narrow sense, the court is right. Not only is Uber breaking German law but the country is correct to demand that a company that operates what is blatantly a private hire business is appropriately licensed and regulated. Pretending that Uber Pop is part of the “sharing economy” and should be allowed to skirt the rules is neither fair to taxi-drivers nor sound policy.

In the broad sense, however, Uber is right. If what the state of California now calls a Transportation Network Company – a technology platform such as Uber and Lyft that expands the market for minicabs and private hire – is prevented from operating on a commercial basis, it is bad for consumers. The potential benefits of innovation are lost.

您已閱讀18%(1002字),剩餘82%(4508字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

約翰•加普

約翰·加普(John Gapper)是英國《金融時報》副主編、首席產業評論員。他的專欄每週四會出現在英國《金融時報》的評論版。加普從1987年開始就在英國《金融時報》工作,報導勞資關係、銀行和媒體。他曾經寫過一本書,叫做《閃閃發亮的騙局》(All That Glitters),講的是霸菱銀行1995年倒閉的內幕。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×