觀點資本主義

Why capitalism remains in rude health

Is capitalism broken? That is the portentous question that I and other Financial Times columnists will be attempting to answer next week in a series of “Great Debates” that the paper is hosting in Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong.

I will be arguing that capitalism is not broken. This is not, at present, a popular position. The market crash of 2008 called the stability of the world’s financial system into question, sparking both a Great Recession and huge government intervention.

But after marshalling the figures for a while, it is a surprisingly easy case to make. Capitalism looks to be decidedly intact. As a favour to my opponents, then, here is why capitalism is not broken.

您已閱讀14%(681字),剩餘86%(4230字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×