蘋果

Lex_Apple

Apple is a shareholder friendly company – but not in the right way.

On Friday, a judge sided with activist investor David Einhorn and prevented Apple from offering shareholders the chance to a vote on three bundled governance provisions. The measure requiring shareholder approval for preferred stock issuance has gotten the most attention, since Mr Einhorn asserts a preferred stock grant could increase Apple’s value per share up to $600.

Ironically, giving shareholders the power to prevent preferred issuance would be considered shareholder friendly at a different company. According to FactSet SharkRepellent, 95 per cent of S&P 500 companies can issue preferreds without asking shareholders. Activist types usually hate this because preferreds form the basis of poison pills that ward off hostile bidders and entrench existing executives.

您已閱讀46%(842字),剩餘54%(970字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×