The debate on bank reform has reached a curious moment. In one half of the conversation, regulators are discussing how to make banks safer for society. In the other half, equity investors are discussing how to make banks safer for their portfolios. If you put the two halves of the debate together, you soon realise that the regulatory conversation is topsy turvy – at least in one crucial respect.
有關銀行改革的辯論進入了一個奇怪時刻。在辯論的一方，監管機構正在討論如何讓銀行對社會更安全。在辯論的另一方，股市投資者正在討論如何讓銀行對他們的投資組合更安全。如果你把這場辯論兩方的觀點綜合在一起，你會很快意識到，有關監管的對話一片混亂，至少從一個關鍵的角度來看是如此。
您已閱讀7%（533字），剩餘93%（7405字）包含更多重要資訊，訂閱以繼續探索完整內容，並享受更多專屬服務。