觀點WTO

The world can’t referee two different trade games

As the director of President Reagan’s strike force against unfair trade, I targeted Airbus subsidies and a variety of Japanese trade barriers. Although we achieved positive results in specific cases, in a broader sense we got nowhere. Airbus still found ways to get subsidies and Japan remained largely impervious to imports.

My experience taught me that in today’s globalised world two different games are being played. One is suggested by the formal rules of the World Trade Organization. The other is a silent mercantilism played by countries that use subsidies and domestic regulations to exploit ambiguities in the formal WTO rules – or that simply ignore them.

I have therefore been bemused by the recent filing of WTO complaints from Washington, Brussels, and Tokyo against China’s export restrictions on rare earths. Not that I think the filings unjustified. Indeed, I believe they are a step in the right direction. But they are a sideshow.

您已閱讀22%(947字),剩餘78%(3374字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×