智慧財產

Beijing makes a subtle shift towards the rule of law

The rule of law is breaking out in China – if not in politics, then in business. In the past month alone, Beijing regulators have used competition law for the first time to tackle monopoly behaviour at two state-owned telecoms groups, and a Shenzhen court has used Chinese intellectual property law to question Apple’s right to sell iPads in China.

There is an Alice in Wonderland quality to it all: China’s scion of central planning, the National Development and Reform Commission, has suddenly morphed into a US-style consumer advocate, indulging in its own version of Ma Bell busting almost exactly 30 years after the most famous competition ruling of all time, in US v AT&T.

And in an equally rare role reversal, a Chinese court has taken the moral high ground on an intellectual property issue. Apple is used to having other people stealing its IP in China. But now it is cast in the role of villain rather than victim: a Chinese judge last week rejected Apple’s claim that it – and not a Taiwan company that registered the trademark first – is the rightful owner of the iPad brand in China.

您已閱讀22%(1094字),剩餘78%(3805字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×