專欄歐元

The eurozone needs more than discipline from Germany

Germany rules. It will determine how well the eurozone prospers, maybe even whether it survives. It is the central European power – geographically, politically and economically. France knows this. The question is how Germany will use its power. The answer will depend not just on how it sees its interests but on how it understands events. I am much more concerned about the latter than the former.

My colleague, Wolfgang Münchau, has defined the objectives of the German government as “limited liability” – do enough to keep the eurozone afloat, while minimising the exposure of German taxpayers. This stance is not uncontroversial, even in Germany. The article by Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Peer Steinbrück, the German foreign minister and minister of finance between 2005 and 2009, in the FT of December 15 demonstrates that. It proposes a combination of a “haircut” for debt holders, debt guarantees for stable countries and limited introduction of Europe-wide bonds, accompanied by better-aligned fiscal policies. But Angela Merkel, Germany’s iron chancellor, rejects guarantees or European bonds. Her proposal is tougher fiscal discipline, along with limited emergency financing, at high interest rates, with deficit countries forced to make rapid and brutal adjustment.

Germany’s dominant position is not just the result of its economic size. It is more because it is the largest creditor nation with the best sovereign credit. When countries with external deficits run out of foreign providers of private credit, they become dependent on foreign sovereigns. That is happening in the eurozone. The power of the creditors is simple: in the absence of their support, deficit countries will be driven into default. The consequent collapse of credit will, in turn, impose rapid cutbacks in spending and a huge recession. This recession, in turn, will make the public finances yet more unmanageable. The downwards spiral will also impose costs on surplus nations, since they must write down their assets and lose export markets. But their surplus position allows them to expand domestic demand, instead. In crises, the mercantilists rule. So it is now in the eurozone.

您已閱讀33%(2169字),剩餘67%(4418字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

馬丁•沃爾夫

馬丁•沃爾夫(Martin Wolf) 是英國《金融時報》副主編及首席經濟評論員。爲嘉獎他對財經新聞作出的傑出貢獻,沃爾夫於2000年榮獲大英帝國勳爵位勳章(CBE)。他是牛津大學納菲爾德學院客座研究員,並被授予劍橋大學聖體學院和牛津經濟政策研究院(Oxonia)院士,同時也是諾丁漢大學特約教授。自1999年和2006年以來,他分別擔任達佛斯(Davos)每年一度「世界經濟論壇」的特邀評委成員和國際傳媒委員會的成員。2006年7月他榮獲諾丁漢大學文學博士;在同年12月他又榮獲倫敦政治經濟學院科學(經濟)博士榮譽教授的稱號。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×