觀點債務

We need a Plan B to curb the debt headwinds
應對債務問題的備用方案


經合組織經濟與發展評審委員會主席威廉•懷特:對宏觀政策重複且非對稱的使用已經令它們失效,我們需要尋求其它方法來幫助應對債務問題。

Policymakers have responded to successive economic downturns in essentially the same Keynesian way since the 1950s. Fiscal deficits have been allowed to rise and interest rates to fall to stimulate aggregate demand. Though Keynes hardly anticipated such repeated use of macro instruments, these policies have worked. As a result, the policy response to the current crisis has been “more of the same”. Many policymakers remain confident that this will eventually generate a sustained recovery. Yet it is worth reflecting on why it might not work this time, and what other public policies might help foster recovery. In short, what is Plan B?

自上世紀50年代以來,政策制定者應對接連不斷的經濟低迷的方式,本質上都是同樣的凱恩斯(Keynes)主義。他們允許財政赤字擴大,並通過降息刺激總需求。儘管凱恩斯幾乎沒有預見到宏觀工具會被如此重複地使用,但這些政策的確奏效了。因此,當前這場危機的應對政策「幾乎大同小異」。許多政策制定者仍然相信,這些政策最終將創造持續的復甦。不過,我們有必要反思一下,爲何它們這次有可能失效,以及還有什麼其它公共政策可能有助於推動復甦。簡言之,什麼是B計劃(即「備用方案」)?

您已閱讀15%(869字),剩餘85%(5036字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×