私人飛機

(Business_Travel)_Grounded_by_the_recession_(795)-31805-31805-31805

When the chief executives of America's big three automakers flew last year in separate corporate jets from Detroit to Washington to ask the US government for a bail-out, there was widespread outrage. It prompted US congressman Gary Ackerman to ask: “Couldn't you all have downgraded to first class or jet-pooled or something to get here? It would have at least sent a message that you do get it.”

Corporate jets have now joined bankers' bonuses as objects of unlimited opprobrium to become the worst symbols of executive excess. Since the backlash against the automakers, companies have been trying rather harder to prove they do “get it”. Last month, Citigroup, the bank, abandoned the purchase of a $50m (€40m, £36m) jet after a storm of negative publicity and Starbucks, the coffee chain, announced plans to sell its new corporate jet less than a month after it had been delivered.

In addition there are obvious environmental concerns. As Greenpeace points out, the amount of of CO2 emitted per passenger travelling by private jet compared to a commercial airliner is significantly higher.

您已閱讀25%(1090字),剩餘75%(3334字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×