專欄G20

The importance of empty words

The world's finest diplomats will spend weeks drafting and redrafting the communiqué that will be issued at the end of the Group of 20 summit in London next week. But why do they bother?

To understand the emptiness of the exercise, you need only look back at the communiqué issued after the G20's first summit in Washington last November. The leaders solemnly declared: “We underscore the critical importance of rejecting protectionism … We will refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services.” To emphasise their determination, they “instructed” their trade ministers to complete the Doha round of trade negotiations by the end of 2008.

And what has happened since then? Naturally, the Doha round has not been completed – not even close. In fact, a World Bank study issued last week showed that 17 of the countries that signed up to the G20's Washington declaration have since taken protectionist measures.

您已閱讀17%(940字),剩餘83%(4508字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

吉狄恩•拉赫曼

吉狄恩•拉赫曼(Gideon Rachman)在英國《金融時報》主要負責撰寫關於美國對外政策、歐盟事務、能源問題、經濟全球化等方面的報導。他經常參與會議、學術和商業活動,並作爲評論人活躍於電視及廣播節目中。他曾擔任《經濟學人》亞洲版主編。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×