歐盟

The global downside of European consumers’ green principles
歐洲消費者的綠色信條在全球造成負面影響

Environmental trade restrictions now reflect noisy campaigners more than protectionist farmers
貝蒂:歐洲公衆的情緒,或者至少是社運人士的影響力,現在是決定歐盟貿易政策的最強大力量之一,但其結果可能適得其反。

Last week, two more shiny new regulatory appliances started to roll off the EU’s legislative assembly line: a due diligence law making companies liable for environmental and human rights abuses in their supply chains and new rules for recycling plastic packaging.Europe might be struggling for long-term economic growth, but its regulatory productivity is unsurpassed. Brussels has also created a deforestation regulation to block the sale of commodities grown on recently cleared land and a carbon border adjustment mechanism compelling overseas exporters in effect to respect Europe’s emissions pricing system, and is devising a rule banning products made with forced labour.

最近,歐盟立法流水線又生成了兩項閃亮的新監管措施:一項是盡職調查法,要求企業對其供應鏈中的破壞環境和侵犯人權行爲負責;另一項是塑膠包裝回收新規。

您已閱讀11%(749字),剩餘89%(6376字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×