Economists’ definitions of so-called safe assets — those that serve as a bolt hole for nervous money in crises — are often devoid of political content. This omission is historically under-informed. Safe assets, like reserve currencies and financial centres, have largely lost their pre-eminent status thanks to war.
經濟學家對所謂「安全資產」——在危機中爲焦慮的資金提供避風港的資產——的定義往往缺乏政治考量。這種遺漏在歷史上是因爲資訊不充分。由於戰爭，像儲備貨幣和金融中心這樣的安全資產在很大程度上已經失去了其卓越地位。
您已閱讀7%（418字），剩餘93%（5374字）包含更多重要資訊，訂閱以繼續探索完整內容，並享受更多專屬服務。