觀點居家辦公

Working from home won’t save the planet

Studies indicate that remote working offers modest emissions savings at best — and at worst is a carbon enhancer

If we stick with the pandemic habit of working from home, it should mean cleaner air, less time wasted in traffic jams and lower carbon emissions.

This inviting thought is pretty much what Professor Mike Berners-Lee wrote last year in a new edition of How Bad Are Bananas?, his excellent 2010 guide to the carbon footprint of almost everything, from a leg of lamb to a volcano.

Berners-Lee, brother of world wide web inventor Tim, is a global authority on this stuff. And at first glance, his book seems to answer a question that is growing more pressing as employers start navigating the uncharted world of hybrid work: is working from home better for the planet? More to the point, could it help to lower fossil-fuelled energy systems driving up global temperatures?

您已閱讀17%(766字),剩餘83%(3671字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×