矽谷

Big Tech has moved from offering utopia to selling dystopia
科技巨擘之變:從烏托邦到反烏托邦


福魯哈爾:矽谷公司已經從滿懷激情的創新者變爲了監控資本家,但目前正在出現的三個變化將影響這些巨擘以及我們所有人。

The tide has finally turned against Big Tech. Last week, Twitter banned political advertising; EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager said she was considering much tougher monopoly standards; the city of Toronto pushed back on Google’s Sidewalk project; Australia sued the search giant over alleged misuse of location data; and US presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren called out Facebook’s political lobbying as she declared she would end the revolving door between business and policy if she wins the White House.

形勢終於變得對科技巨擘不利。上週,Twitter宣佈禁止政治廣告;歐盟競爭事務專員瑪格麗特•韋斯塔格(Margrethe Vestager)表示,她正在考慮制定更嚴厲的反壟斷準則;多倫多市推遲了谷歌(Google)的Sidewalk項目;澳洲以涉嫌濫用位置數據爲由起訴了這家搜尋巨擘;美國總統候選人伊麗莎白•沃倫(Elizabeth Warren)公開批評Facebook的政治遊說,宣稱如果她入主白宮,她將關閉商業與政策之間的「旋轉門」。

您已閱讀10%(738字),剩餘90%(6444字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×