專欄英國生活水準

Blame feeble productivity growth for stagnant living standards

In the financial year that ends on April 5, real household median incomes in the UK will at last regain the levels of 2007-08. So forecasts the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Does this mean the UK’s “standard of living”[PRIMARILY A UK DEBATE? OR BEYOND?] debate should be over? No: it is very much alive, not just with respect to the past but also with respect to the future.

The striking feature of the IFS analysis is the weakness of recovery. Real median incomes are estimated to have fallen by 4 per cent between 2009-10 and 2011-12. This is not exceptional: they fell by 7.3 per cent between 1973 and 1977 and 5.7 per cent between 1980 and 1982. But real median incomes are forecast to rise only 1.8 per cent in the three years after 2011-12, against 13.2 per cent and 9.2 per cent in the three years after the troughs of the 1970s and early 1980s. The recovery in living standards has been very weak this time. This, not the severity of the post-crisis decline, largely explains the stagnation.

It is important to understand what the numbers used by the IFS mean. They show household incomes after tax and benefits. But they exclude publicly provided services, such as health and education. This is an important qualification, since the latter also affect standards of living, properly measured.

您已閱讀26%(1298字),剩餘74%(3628字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

馬丁•沃爾夫

馬丁•沃爾夫(Martin Wolf) 是英國《金融時報》副主編及首席經濟評論員。爲嘉獎他對財經新聞作出的傑出貢獻,沃爾夫於2000年榮獲大英帝國勳爵位勳章(CBE)。他是牛津大學納菲爾德學院客座研究員,並被授予劍橋大學聖體學院和牛津經濟政策研究院(Oxonia)院士,同時也是諾丁漢大學特約教授。自1999年和2006年以來,他分別擔任達佛斯(Davos)每年一度「世界經濟論壇」的特邀評委成員和國際傳媒委員會的成員。2006年7月他榮獲諾丁漢大學文學博士;在同年12月他又榮獲倫敦政治經濟學院科學(經濟)博士榮譽教授的稱號。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×