中國銀行業

Lex_Chinese banks

Chinese banks are cheap. This is a truth universally acknowledged. But it is also well known that there are good reasons for them to command a low multiple. China’s economy is slowing down; the property and credit cycles are both reaching the point where a true bust looks possible; corporate governance is horrible and involves placing blind faith in China’s Communist party.

But there is a case that Chinese financials offer the margin of safety required by value investors. Take Bank of China. It has kept churning out a return on equity of 18 per cent through the economic slowdown of the last three years, is adequately capitalised and trades at 0.87 times book value (and 5.2 times trailing earnings). It is manifestly too big to fail, so some government aid would arrive if worst comes to worst.

Does this add up to the necessary margin of safety? Possibly not. The realistic worst-case scenario is highly plausible, and seriously damaging. But it is possible to create a margin of safety by hedging. And China’s importance in the world economy means that the worst-case scenario for Bank of China is easy to hedge.

您已閱讀60%(1120字),剩餘40%(757字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×