美聯準

Lex_Banks/Basel III
Lex專欄:巴塞爾III能帶來什麼?


美國多數大銀行已有足夠資本滿足巴塞爾協議III的要求,它們無疑比金融危機以前擁有更多可吸收虧損的資本。但至於銀行是否真的變得更「安全」了,則是另一碼事。

On the face of it, most big US banks have amassed enough capital to satisfy Basel III. On Tuesday, the Federal Reserve released details of the new capital rules, which will be implemented in January. Banks need to hold a minimum ratio of 7 per cent core tier one equity to risk-weighted assets, phased in over five years. Those active internationally have to hold an extra buffer of up to 2.5 per cent of RWAs. The worst crisis-hit banks, such as Bank of America and Citigroup, are already more or less there. JPMorgan and Wells Fargo are only a bit shy, with 8.9 and 8.4 per cent, respectively.

表面上,美國大多數大銀行已有足夠資本滿足巴塞爾協議III(Basel III)的規定。週二,美聯準(Federal Reserve)公佈了新的資本規則細節,將從1月開始實施。銀行須持有相對於風險加權資產至少7%的股本,在五年期間分階段逐步實現。那些活躍於全球的銀行須持有額外緩衝,最高達風險加權資產的2.5%。受金融危機打擊最重的銀行,如美國銀行(Bank of America)和花旗集團(Citigroup),都已大致達到這一要求。摩根大通(JPMorgan)和富國銀行(Wells Fargo)略低於要求,分別爲8.9%和8.4%。

您已閱讀34%(864字),剩餘66%(1714字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×