幸福指數

ONS stumbles over low data hurdle

“Happiness is important. Statistics are useful. Therefore, statistics about happiness are important and useful.” The logic of this implicit argument certainly doesn’t stand up. (Sex is important. Coffee mugs are useful. Are coffee mugs about sex therefore important and useful?)

The idea of collecting statistics on wellbeing deserves the benefit of the doubt. I worry, though, that every new wellbeing report from the Office for National Statistics just deepens that doubt. This latest is a grab-bag of statistics: income, job satisfaction, carbon monoxide levels. Some are collected by the ONS and some are not. There seems to be no serious analysis.

The aim, then, is presumably communication. This is awkward; communication is really not the ONS’s strong point. The report makes much of a vague visual similarity between the path of life satisfaction and real household actual income, or RHAI. Type that into the ONS website, and the top five results are all in Welsh, headed by a report titled “O’r gegin i ganolfan brosesu’r cyfrifiad”.

您已閱讀65%(1040字),剩餘35%(559字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×