世界經濟

Economics must heed political risk
經濟學必須考慮政治風險


美國對外關係委員會高級研究員馬拉貝:在不確定性很高的時代,精確預言的價值是可疑的;預測所涉及的風險比預測結果本身更重要。

The radicals in academic finance would revamp the basic metric of economic performance. The familiar statistics on gross domestic product would be coupled with an index of financial risk-taking, so that the usual focus on growth would be tempered by a measure of the danger that growth might suddenly implode. This month of all months, one craves an equivalent risk-weighting to reflect political uncertainty. Amid the marathon reality show of the American elections, the tense theatre of the Chinese transition and the anarchic agitprop of eurozone politics, non-risk-weighted economic forecasts verge on irrelevance. Even with the US election behind us, this is not about to change.

激進的金融學者將改革衡量經濟表現的基本指標:除了人們熟知的國內生產毛額(GDP)統計數據以外,還將加上一個衡量金融冒險程度的指標。由此,人們通常對成長的關注,將被一個衡量成長突然崩潰風險的指標所調和。本月就特別需要一個風險加權指標來反映政治上的不確定性:美國馬拉松式的大選真人秀、中國氣氛緊張的領導層換屆、再加上歐元區政界大肆鼓吹無政府主義,讓非風險加權的經濟預測幾乎變得毫無價值。儘管美國大選已經結束,但這種情況在短時間內不會改變。

您已閱讀12%(901字),剩餘88%(6569字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×