觀點GDP

Though yardsticks abound, the question is what they all add up to

The observation that “what ismeasured counts” underpins much of the dissatisfaction with national accounts and gross domestic product.

Attempts to maximise the growth rate of GDP – which measures the value of an economy’s total output – can arguably encourage traffic congestion through the higher production and sale of petrol. It can foster crime as the work of the police, the insurance industry and fixing physical damage counts as output in GDP. It can help generate inequality since only the total matters, not its distribution across the population.

Dissatisfaction with national income measures is also nothing new. In the 1960s Robert Kennedy criticised those who judged the US by its GDP, arguing that it counted pollution, cigarette advertising, special locks in jails, napalm and nuclear warheads among other evils – but not the beauty of poetry, wit, the strength of marriage, courage, wisdom, learning or compassion. “It measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile,” he said. “It can tell us everything about America except why we are proud that we are Americans.”

您已閱讀30%(1102字),剩餘70%(2617字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×