觀點家族企業

FAMILY STILL HAS A ROLE TO PLAY

When the Asian economic crisis hit South Korea in 1997, many commentators argued that the country's problems were due in part to the power wielded by the chaebol, its big, family-controlled conglomerates. The biggest were Samsung, Hyundai, Lucky Goldstar (LG) and Daewoo. These groups, it was said, were spread over too many industries; they had too cosy a relationship with the government, which gave them privileged access to low-cost capital; and their corporate governance arrangements were opaque.

According to the critics, reforms were urgently needed to bring the management of these companies in line with Anglo-American practice.

The Asian crisis was indeed traumatic for South Korea. Some reforms were made, and some of the chaebol went under, the most spectacular collapse being Daewoo. But the better-managed groups adjusted to the new environment – including the greater presence of foreign investors – and they still play a dominant role in the economy. The ownership of Korean industry today is not very different from in the pre-crisis period. The Samsung Group is still controlled by the Lee family, LG by the Koo family, the Hyundai Group by the Chung family, and the SK group by the Chey family.

您已閱讀18%(1212字),剩餘82%(5492字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×