專欄減稅

OBAMA MUST BREAK HIS TAX PROMISE

Between now and the November elections, the biggest political fight in the US is likely to be about taxes. Unless Congress acts, big tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 during George Bush's presidency will expire at the end of the year. With the recovery faltering, Republicans and Democrats understand that reversing all of the cuts so soon is a bad idea, but this is where their agreement stops.

Democrats want to make most of the tax cuts permanent. Republicans want to make all of them permanent. Fiscally speaking, the two sides are not as far apart as they pretend: they are almost equally wrong. Politically speaking, they cannot converge. With both sides seeking maximum advantage, gridlock is a distinct possibility.

Ordinarily, this would mean that nothing happens – and there are worse outcomes than that, you might think. In this case, gridlock means dramatic action: a swingeing tax increase with the economy still on its knees. It puts paralysis as usual in a frightening new light.

您已閱讀19%(992字),剩餘81%(4314字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×