保護主義

The contrasting tales of TikTok and Nippon Steel

Pace of US deglobalisation is accelerating, with sometimes dubious motives

Deglobalisation seems to be moving up a gear. The US House of Representatives last week passed a bill that would in effect ban TikTok in America unless its Chinese owner sells the video-sharing app. Barely 24 hours later, President Joe Biden signalled his opposition to the proposed $14.9bn takeover of US Steel by Nippon Steel of Japan, saying it was vital for America’s third-largest steelmaker to remain “domestically owned and operated”. Both moves have been portrayed, in broad terms, as linked to national security. One looks more like crude electoral politics.

There is at least a plausible case that a Chinese-owned TikTok poses a threat to US security. US officials have long feared Beijing could subvert the app to spy on, or spread propaganda or misinformation to, its 170mn American users. ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, has failed to convince Washington that its move to secure US user data on American-based Oracle servers is watertight.

Other potential solutions exist on data: the US could, given the legislative will, enact a ban on all tech companies, domestic and foreign, from transferring data to foreign countries. The propaganda concern is harder to deal with. About a third of US adults under 30 now regularly get news on TikTok, according to Pew Research. The sheer volume of TikTok content, and the personalised experiences its algorithm serves up, make it complex to track. US regulators have long restricted foreign-owned companies from holding TV broadcast licences; updating this rule, in effect, for social media has some logic.

您已閱讀42%(1562字),剩餘58%(2193字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×