保護主義

The contrasting tales of TikTok and Nippon Steel
FT社評:美國應區別對待TikTok和日本製鐵

Pace of US deglobalisation is accelerating, with sometimes dubious motives
拜登反對日本製鐵收購美國鋼鐵公司,似乎將短期選舉考慮置於實際經濟利益之上。

Deglobalisation seems to be moving up a gear. The US House of Representatives last week passed a bill that would in effect ban TikTok in America unless its Chinese owner sells the video-sharing app. Barely 24 hours later, President Joe Biden signalled his opposition to the proposed $14.9bn takeover of US Steel by Nippon Steel of Japan, saying it was vital for America’s third-largest steelmaker to remain “domestically owned and operated”. Both moves have been portrayed, in broad terms, as linked to national security. One looks more like crude electoral politics.

去全球化似乎正在加速。美國衆議院上週通過了一項法案,除非TikTok的中國所有者出售這款影片分享應用,否則該法案實際上將在美國封禁TikTok。僅僅24小時後,美國總統喬•拜登(Joe Biden)表示,他反對日本日本製鐵(Nippon Steel)以149億美元收購美國鋼鐵公司(US Steel)的提議,稱美國第三大鋼鐵製造商保持「美國所有權和在國內經營」至關重要。總的來說,這兩項舉措都被描述爲與國家安全有關。但其中之一看起來更像是粗暴的選舉政治。

您已閱讀15%(794字),剩餘85%(4367字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×