The plaintiff is conflicted. The legal arguments appear tenuous. And, in places, the 35-page lawsuit that Elon Musk filed last week with the Superior Court of California against OpenAI reads like a mash-up between a science fiction film script and a letter from a jilted lover. But Musk’s submission that OpenAI has breached its founding charter and endangers humanity by prioritising profit over safety may still turn into the most substantial move yet to scrutinise the company’s attempts to develop artificial general intelligence.
原告內心矛盾。法律論據顯得牽強。而且，伊隆•馬斯克(Elon Musk)上週在加州高等法院(Superior Court of California)提起的針對OpenAI的35頁起訴書的某些段落，看起來像是科幻電影劇本與被拋棄的情人的訴苦信的混合體。但馬斯克的基本主張——OpenAI將利潤置於安全之上，從而違反其創辦章程，並危害人類——仍可能會成爲監督該公司開發通用人工智慧(AGI)嘗試的迄今最爲實質性的舉措。
您已閱讀12%（743字），剩餘88%（5649字）包含更多重要資訊，訂閱以繼續探索完整內容，並享受更多專屬服務。