觀點奢侈品

Why luxury goods just isn’t a platform business

In a sector where only a few brands really matter, Farfetch’s path to profitability is not clear

In many walks of life, platform companies do very well. It is perfectly possible to create a digital space that connects large numbers of buyers and sellers, and make a decent cut out of each transaction. See Uber, which now has a market value of more than $126bn. Or Airbnb, worth about $87bn.

Compare and contrast such success stories with Farfetch. The platform once hoped to be the “Uber of luxury”. At one time it was worth $24bn. It fetched very little in the end. A $500mn deal at the end of the year, with Korean etailer Coupang and Greenoaks Capital Partner, wiped out the equity entirely.

Farfetch’s unravelling points to a fundamental problem in creating a platform for luxury goods. Unlike the fragmented universe of drivers, rental accommodation, beauty products or food delivery, there are not many luxury brands that really matter. 

您已閱讀40%(845字),剩餘60%(1246字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×