觀點社群媒體

Twitter/X: maverick rebrand leaves Musk with a cross to bear

Replacing one’s brand risks annoying and confusing customers, and the direct financial cost can be high

There are few better ways to signal corporate distress than a rebrand. Last year, Elon Musk spent $44bn buying Twitter, a midsized social media company. Jettisoning its globally recognised brand does nothing to address the lossmaking company’s problems. But as new names go, X is better than most. It is short, arresting and unmistakable.

Name pivots are common across early stage US tech companies. Amazon began life as Cadabra, Snapchat started out as Picaboo and Instagram’s prototype was called Burbn. Twitter, which was born out of a company called Odeo, was once spelled Twttr.

But rebrands in later corporate life are different. From tobacco seller Philip Morris to Facebook, they tend to highlight problems they are designed to cover. They risk annoying and confusing customers. The direct financial cost, including domain name purchases, can be high.

您已閱讀35%(857字),剩餘65%(1618字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×