觀點職場多元化與平等

Economists’ models miss the gains from more women in the workforce

Data suggest that male and female employees are not perfect substitutes in production

The writer is professor of the practice at Georgetown University and a former IMF deputy research director

In a speech last month, US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen lamented the loss of economic potential across the globe from low female labour force participation. Meanwhile, commerce secretary Gina Raimondo has called attention to the urgent need for childcare policies to attract women back into the workforce following the pandemic. And recent research has produced eye-catching estimates of the economic growth dividend from higher FLFP.

Those estimates, impressive as they are, nevertheless considerably understate the economic gains from higher FLFP. Economists approach the question of how gender inclusion affects economic wellbeing through a so-called headcount exercise: adding a woman to the labour force yields the same benefits as adding a man. A worker is a worker, and the gender of the worker is immaterial. What matters for economic growth is the total headcount.

您已閱讀26%(981字),剩餘74%(2861字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×