新興市場

Twenty years on, the Brics have disappointed

The challenge of how these countries achieve higher prosperity across society remains unsolved

The writer is a former chief economist at Goldman Sachs and served as a UK Treasury minister in David Cameron’s government

It is 20 years since I published a paper which formally grouped together the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China and coined the term “Brics” to describe them. I argued that since these countries were likely to continue their striking gross domestic product growth over the next decade, we urgently needed them to play a bigger role in global governance. With France, Germany and Italy in permanent economic and monetary union, I suggested their individual places in the G7 and corresponding representation at the IMF and World Bank could be consolidated into a single European seat, making way for the Bric countries to join a slightly expanded G7.

It was not until 2003, when my team published a further piece entitled “Dreaming with Brics”, that we hypothesised these four nations could collectively become bigger economies than those of the G6 (excluding Canada). Our timing was fortuitous, coinciding with a globalisation boom which meant many international companies doing more business in Bric countries.

您已閱讀25%(1149字),剩餘75%(3442字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×