美國

Leader_The US Senate and its duty to justice
FT社評:美國參議院不應忘記司法責任

Whoever Donald Trump nominates to the Supreme Court deserves special scrutiny
川普提名的最高法官大法官人選應該得到參議院的特別審查,這攸關最高法院是否有能力限制行政權力。

Almost the whole chain of the US justice system is submerged in controversy of some kind. At the front end, there are the enforcers, the police, whose tactics have been the subject of protests since the killing of George Floyd, a black man, in Minnesota last May. At the remote extreme of the system, the Supreme Court is on the verge of a lasting shift to the right, to the anguish of liberal America. In between is the justice department, which Donald Trump’s administration has often politicised to its own ends.

美國司法系統的幾乎整個鏈條都陷入某種爭議之中。在最前端是執法者——警察,自今年五月在明尼蘇達州黑人喬治•佛洛伊德(George Floyd)被殺以來,警察的策略就一直是抗議的主題。在這個體系的極遠端,美國最高法院即將持久地轉向右翼,這讓美國的自由派感到痛苦。在兩者之間是司法部,唐納•川普(Donald Trump)政府經常爲了自身的目的將這一部門政治化。

您已閱讀14%(695字),剩餘86%(4287字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×