專欄新型冠狀病毒

How Boris Johnson lost control

A powerful prime minister means little without a governing purpose

Seizing control is all very well. Sometimes forgotten is that power is useful only when you have a notion of what you want to do with it. Boris Johnson has stumbled upon this truth during an ill-starred year in 10 Downing Street. Mr Johnson’s personal ambition never looked beyond becoming prime minister. With his hands finally on the levers of power, but lacking anything resembling a prospectus, he has been lost.

Initially, he seemed to think Brexit — “taking back control” as the Brexiters call it — would be purpose enough. In the event, his premiership is being shaped by coronavirus. Here, all the decision-making has belonged to No 10 from the outset, with no one in Brussels to gainsay British politicians. The policy and communications strategy have belonged to the prime minister and his special adviser Dominic Cummings. The result has been a shambles.

Mr Johnson was at first too slow to recognise the threat and then too impatient to lift the economic lockdown before it had sufficiently suppressed the virus. The result is that the UK has had the highest number of excess deaths from coronavirus of any nation in Europe, people are confused about the remaining rules and the government has had to call a halt to Mr Johnson’s plans for further relaxation of social and economic restrictions. His trademark “boosterism” has proven to be no match for a deadly virus.

您已閱讀26%(1377字),剩餘74%(3968字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前擔任英國《金融時報》的副主編。作爲FT的首席政治評論員,他的專欄每兩週更新一次,評論全球和英國的事務。他著述甚豐,曾經爲英國前首相托尼-布萊爾寫傳記。斯蒂芬斯畢業於牛津大學,目前和家人住在倫敦。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×