退休年齡

Leader_We need a more flexible approach to working age

At the age of 97, John Goodenough this week became the oldest person ever to win a Nobel Prize. The chemistry professor thereby settled an old score: 33 years before he won the award his employer, the University of Oxford, tried to make him retire before he wanted to. He “fled”, in his words, to Texas where he has spent the entire intervening period happily working — often at weekends.

Prof Goodenough’s work ethic demonstrates what is wrong with the oft-told story in rich countries about the young shouldering an ever greater burden as they support an ageing population. Those like the professor who might once have been pensioned off by their mid-sixties are now working longer themselves. The young, meanwhile, do not go off to earn as early as they once did, and spend far longer studying.

Social scientists have traditionally used a “dependency ratio” comparing the number of those between the ages of 15 and 64 to everyone else in order to assess the sustainability of welfare states. Those of “working age” must support those who cannot work. A high dependency ratio means fewer people are funding healthcare, education and social security programmes.

您已閱讀32%(1160字),剩餘68%(2457字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×