專欄歐洲

Europe’s unpleasant choice between Trump and Xi

The task of Whitehall’s National Security Council is to map the threats facing Britain. It has plenty of material to work with: Islamist terrorism, Russian revanchism, the Middle East in flames, rising nationalism, nuclear proliferation and Chinese cyber attacks among them. The other day, though, the council’s senior min-isters and policymakers took a different tack. What if the biggest danger turned out to be hiding in plain sight?

The question posed — and, as I understand it, not fully answered — at this particular meeting was whether the strategic challenge lay not so much in the intentions of known adversaries, but in those of Britain’s most vital ally. For 70 years the cherished special relationship with Washington has been a pillar of British foreign policy. But for how much longer will the US be a dependable ally?

Reading the latest headlines you can see why Theresa May’s government might have doubts. The prime minister is fighting for her political life to win parliamentary support for the Brexit deal she has struck with the EU27. US president Donald Trump’s response to her predicament was the casually wounding judgment that Brussels seemed to have called all the shots and may well have thwarted a bilateral trade accord between Britain and the US. With friends like that . . .

您已閱讀24%(1302字),剩餘76%(4057字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前擔任英國《金融時報》的副主編。作爲FT的首席政治評論員,他的專欄每兩週更新一次,評論全球和英國的事務。他著述甚豐,曾經爲英國前首相托尼-布萊爾寫傳記。斯蒂芬斯畢業於牛津大學,目前和家人住在倫敦。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×