專欄英國退歐公投

Civil servants will decide what Brexit actually means

Twenty years ago I had lunch in London with a senior civil servant. This was at the tail-end of the decadent London lunching era and, after a lot of wine, he asked me what I thought of the minister he worked for. I said I’d interviewed the minister and he seemed a nice bloke. “The man”, said the civil servant, leaning across the table for emphasis, “is an animal!”

Anyone who remembers the 1980s television comedy series Yes Minister and Yes, Prime Minister knows that British civil servants and ministers are forever locked in a silent power struggle. That struggle will shape the form that Brexit ultimately takes. British voters chose Brexit; Theresa May’s new government has promised to implement it. But, in practice, civil servants will mostly sort out how exactly it is done. And these people are good at getting their way.

In the first episode of Yes, Prime Minister, the new prime minister, Jim Hacker, egged on by the government’s chief scientific adviser, concocts a whizzo scheme for a conscription army. Hacker, delighted with himself, exclaims: “Why didn’t I think of this before?” and the chief scientific adviser replies: “Because we only just met.”

您已閱讀23%(1165字),剩餘77%(3930字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

西蒙•庫柏

西蒙•庫柏(Simon Kuper)1994年加入英國《金融時報》,在1998年離開FT之前,他撰寫一個每日更新的貨幣專欄。2002年,他作爲體育專欄作家重新加入FT,一直至今。如今,他爲FT週末版雜誌撰寫一個話題廣泛的專欄。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×